[svnbook] r4387 committed - Finish issue 65 ("Please talk about the cases where a true DVCS like...

Stefan Sperling stsp at elego.de
Mon Feb 4 13:44:39 CST 2013

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 02:32:43PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> But, for example, if git-svn is
> known to improve the handling of renames or merging or something else over
> what stock Subversion can offer, that could be of sufficient value.

It doesn't, at least not from Subversion's perspective.
If you copy/rename a dir in git-svn, it will copy each file in the dir
separately in the resulting svn commit.

More information about the svnbook-dev mailing list