work-in-progress tree conflicts diff, please comment

[Stefan Sperling]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 04:55:09AM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > +      <para>Since Subversion 1.6, this and other similar situations
> > +        are flagged as conflicts in the working copy. As with textual
> > +        conflicts, tree conflicts prevent a commit from being made
> 
> Ha!  You even said "textual conflicts" here.  :-)  Maybe that should show up
> as a <firstterm> somewhere in the section that talks about those types of
> conflicts?

The first time this term occurs is on page 23,
where example output of svn status is listed:

  ? scratch.c         # file is not under version control
  A stuff/loot/bloo.h # file is scheduled for addition
  C stuff/loot/lump.c # file has textual conflicts from an update
  D stuff/fish.c      # file is scheduled for deletion
  M bar.c             # the content in bar.c has local modifications

I don't think it's worth highlighting the term there.
Adding another paragraph just to be able to highlight
the term would be a bit silly, wouldn't it?

Stefan