Question on resolve(d) (Issue 112)

[C. Michael Pilato]

By the way, the help text for 'svn resolved' actually gives the hint you 
probably needed:

    ... deprecated in favor of running 'svn resolve --accept working'

Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I'm not sure I fully understand what's going on here.  It looks like
> (at least in 1.5 rc8), we now have resolve *and* resolved, both doing
> different things.  If I understand correctly, 'svn resolve' actually
> resolves conflicts according to what you pass in --accept, and 'svn
> resolved' does what it's always done.  The help for 'svn resolve'
> doesn't list 'merged' as an option, so it doesn't seem to be a
> complete superset of 'svn resolved' (even tho it does accept 'merged'
> acc. to the source), so is 'svn resolved' not deprecated?  Is there a
> reason 'merged' is left out of the help for 'svn resolve'?  Should I
> fix the help on trunk and file a CHANGE for the 1.5 branch?
> 
> -Fitz, thoroughly confused.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> svnbook-dev mailing list
> svnbook-dev at red-bean.com
> http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/svnbook-dev
> 


-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at red-bean.com> | http://cmpilato.blogspot.com/

"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting.  It has
  been found difficult; and left untried."  -- G. K. Chesterton