ch02: Ambiguous wording in example

C. Michael Pilato cmpilato at
Fri Aug 15 00:48:55 CDT 2008

As with the other recent suggestions, I'll see what I can do.  We're 
currently in a don't-touch-the-XML mode at ORA.  We can make these changes 
immediately to our own source tree, though.  I'll try to do so later today 

Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I'm fine with making both of these.  Cmpilato, what do you think?  Is
> it too late?
> -Fitz
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jens M. Felderhoff <j.m.f at> wrote:
>> Some more for the same section:
>>  If you've postponed a conflict,...
>> should be
>>  If you've postponed a conflict resolution,...
>> In the paragraphs describing the arguments to the --accept option, the
>> repective arguments should be tagged with "literal" instead of
>> "replaceable" elements.
>> Cheers
>> Jens
>> _______________________________________________
>> svnbook-dev mailing list
>> svnbook-dev at

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato at> |

"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting.  It has
  been found difficult; and left untried."  -- G. K. Chesterton

More information about the svnbook-dev mailing list