"[SvnBook] #29: (Trimmed) comments from Ward Bergmans" <ward181079 at yahoo.com>

SvnBook noreply at red-bean.com
Sun Feb 25 22:16:29 CST 2007


#29: (Trimmed) comments from Ward Bergmans <ward181079 at yahoo.com>
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  cmpilato  |       Owner:  nobody
     Type:  defect    |      Status:  new   
 Priority:  normal    |   Milestone:  1.4   
Component:  content   |     Version:        
 Keywords:            |  
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 I've got some feedback on Version Control with Subversion for Subversion
 1.2 (book compiled from Revision 2147) Here it comes:

  * page 54 – Tracking Merges Manually:  Add a footnote to the text
 "demonstrated in the earlier example". A footnote like "In paragraph
 'Copying Specific Changes' on page 52."

  * page 55 – Best Practices for Merging: Extra best practice: Commit
 workspace before merging.
    * Because then the commit after the merge is "ported r#:r# from x"
 instead of "ported r#:r# from x and changed this and also that and that
 and..."
    * Because if a merge goes wrong you can simply run svn revert without
 losing local modifications.

  * page 90 – Migrating a Repository: Change the steps to:
 {{{
 3. Create new empty ones in their place using your new svnadmin.
 (...)
 7. Validate that the migration is successful, and move your old
 repositories out of the way.
 }}}

  * page 142: I think the term "working copy authorization" is better than
 "software authorization". Because it is possible that you manage the same
 working copy with multiple software applications. For example, you can use
 Subclipe to manage my working copy, but when you have not started Eclipse
 and just want to edit a little thing very fast, then you can use the svn
 command line client. The way I understand your book is that the lock is
 kept in the working copy, and not in the software. So "working copy
 authorization" is a better name.

  * Chapter 5, section "Repository Creation and Configuration": Add a
 subsection "FSFS" which explains how to create a FSFS repository (under a
 Unix like operating system) with the proper rights. Now only the Berkeley
 DB repository is explained in more detail. When I create a FSFS repository
 under Linux as explained in your book (svnadmin crate –fs-type fsfs
 /path/to/repos). And then do an initial import as explained in your book.
 I get the following error: "svn: Can't create directory
 '/home/svnrepo/db/transactions/0-1.txn': Permission denied"  It would be
 very helpful if your snvbook would explain more about FSFS repository
 configuration. I know that a solution to my problem above could be to give
 everybody read and write access on all the repository files. But I don't
 want to do that. Therefore I would like to know:
     * Which files need to be read to read from the repository?
     * Which files need to be read to write to the repository?
     * Which files need to be written to write to the repository?
     * How can I easily give the proper rights to these files? For every
 possible situation, like "owner and group can read and write, others can't
 access the repository", "owner and group can read and write, others can
 only read", etc. (...I don't want to change the rights file by file,
 because that takes ages. Therefore I want to know an easy way)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://svnbook.red-bean.com/trac/ticket/29>
SvnBook <http://svnbook.red-bean.com/>


More information about the svnbook-dev mailing list